检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭忠奇[1] 林益明[1] 丁印龙[1] 廖启炓[2] 林鹏[1]
机构地区:[1]厦门大学生命科学学院,厦门361005 [2]厦门市园林植物园,厦门361003
出 处:《应用生态学报》2004年第7期1135-1138,共4页Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基 金:国家建设部和厦门市政园林局资助项目 (YK 2 0 0 0 0 5 )
摘 要:对 5种丛生状棕榈植物—欧洲棕、细叶棕竹、小箬棕、玲珑椰子、缨络椰子的叶片热值和灰分含量的月变化进行了研究 .结果表明 ,5种植物具有较高的灰分含量 ,但灰分含量的月变化趋势各不相同 ;欧洲棕、细叶棕竹、小箬棕 3种植物干重热值的月变化趋势有些差异 ,同属的缨络椰子、玲珑椰子干重热值的月变化趋势基本相似 ;缨络椰子、小箬棕的干重热值与灰分含量具有显著的线性相关 (P <0 0 5 ) ,而其余 3种植物的干重热值与灰分含量相关性不显著 (P >0 0 5 ) ;从去灰分热值的月变化来看 ,细叶棕竹与小箬棕 ,缨络椰子与玲珑椰子的月变化趋势相似 .Studies on the monthly changes in the ash contents and caloric values of 5 shrubby Palmae species(Chamaerops humilis,Rhapis gracilis,Sabal minor,Chamaedorea cataractarum,Chamaedorea brachypoda)leaves showed that annual average ash content of the five shrubby species was 4.87%±1.37% for Chamaerops humilis,8 33%±0.89% for Rhapis gracilis,7.85%±2.64% for Sabal minor,9.20%±1.35% for Chamaedorea cataractarum,and 12.42%±1.78% for Chamaedorea brachypoda.The monthly changes of gross caloric value were different for Chamaerops humilis,Rhapis gracilis and Sabal minor,but similar to each other for Chamaedorea cataractarum and Chamaedorea brachypoda,and the annual average gross caloric value of the five shrubby species was 20.50±0.32 kJ·g -1 for Chamaerops humilis,20.04±0.50 kJ·g -1 for Rhapis gracilis,20.21±0.68 kJ·g -1 for Sabal minor,20.52±0.48 kJ·g -1 for Chamaedorea cataractarum and 18.90±0.47 kJ·g -1 for Chamaedorea brachypoda.The gross caloric values were correlated remarkably with ash contents for Chamaedorea cataractarum and Sabal minor(P<0.05),but there was no significant correlation between gross caloric values and ash contents for other three species(P>0.05).Rhapis gracilis and Sabal minor,and Chamaedorea cataractarum and Chamaedorea brachypoda had similar monthly changes in ash free caloric values,respectively.The average ash free caloric value of the five shrubby species was 21.55±0.53 kJ·g -1 for Chamaerops humilis,21.87±0.46 kJ·g -1 for Rhapis gracilis,21.84±0.53 kJ·g -1 for Sabal minor,22.60±0.81 kJ·g -1 for Chamaedorea cataractarum,and 21.59±0.63 kJ·g -1 for Chamaedorea brachypoda.Chamaedorea cataractarum had a higher ash free caloric value than other four species (P<0.05),and the ash free caloric values of Chamaerops humilis,Rhapis gracilis,Sabal minor and Chamaedorea brachypoda were similar,the differences being not significant by t test(P>0.05).
分 类 号:S792.91[农业科学—林木遗传育种]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.10.2