检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国长城铝业公司总医院骨科,河南省郑州市450041
出 处:《中华创伤骨科杂志》2004年第6期701-703,共3页Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
摘 要:目的评价切开复位与撬拨复位治疗跟骨骨折的疗效。方法1997年6月~2002年12月收治跟骨关节压缩性骨折62例,其中切开复位33例,撬拨复位29例。结果按Maryland足部评分系统评价术后功能,切开复位组优良率明显高于撬拨复位组。结论切开复位能较好的恢复跟骨的解剖结构,从而取得较好疗效。Objective To evaluate the effects of open reduction and poking reduction in the treatment of calcaneal compression fractures. Method From June 1997 to December 2002, 62 cases of calcaneal compression fracture sought for treatment in our department. 33 of them were treated with open reduction, and 29 with poking reduction. Results The Maryland foot assessment score system was used for evaluation. The excellent and good rate was significantly higher for those treated by open reduction than by poking reduction. Conclusion Open reduction can achieve better calcaneal anatomic reduction and thus better treatment results.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200