跟骨压缩性骨折切开复位与撬拨复位治疗比较  被引量:15

Open reduction and poking reduction for treatment of calcaneal compression fractures

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:韩立新 李旭芬 李凤新 

机构地区:[1]中国长城铝业公司总医院骨科,河南省郑州市450041

出  处:《中华创伤骨科杂志》2004年第6期701-703,共3页Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

摘  要:目的评价切开复位与撬拨复位治疗跟骨骨折的疗效。方法1997年6月~2002年12月收治跟骨关节压缩性骨折62例,其中切开复位33例,撬拨复位29例。结果按Maryland足部评分系统评价术后功能,切开复位组优良率明显高于撬拨复位组。结论切开复位能较好的恢复跟骨的解剖结构,从而取得较好疗效。Objective To evaluate the effects of open reduction and poking reduction in the treatment of calcaneal compression fractures. Method From June 1997 to December 2002, 62 cases of calcaneal compression fracture sought for treatment in our department. 33 of them were treated with open reduction, and 29 with poking reduction. Results The Maryland foot assessment score system was used for evaluation. The excellent and good rate was significantly higher for those treated by open reduction than by poking reduction. Conclusion Open reduction can achieve better calcaneal anatomic reduction and thus better treatment results.

关 键 词:跟骨骨折 切开复位 撬拨复位 

分 类 号:R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象