检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]青岛大学附属医院急诊科,山东 青岛
出 处:《临床医学进展》2024年第5期25-33,共9页Advances in Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的:以“三维质量结构”模式为理论依据,构建急性胰腺炎护理质量评价指标体系,为临床评价急性胰腺炎的护理质量提供参考。方法:通过文献回顾、专家咨询和层次分析法对22名专家完成有效函询,获得专家一致性意见,确定急性胰腺炎护理质量评价指标体系的内容及各指标的权重。结果:2轮函询中,问卷回收率分别为95.65%、100%,权威系数分别为0.86、0.88,协调系数为0.406、0.391、0.325,具有统计学意义。最终形成包括3个一级指标、11个二级指标、28个三级指标的急性胰腺炎护理质量评价指标体系。结论:构建的急性胰腺炎护理质量评价指标体系具有较高的科学性和可靠性,为急性胰腺炎护理质量的评价提供依据。Objective: Develop nursing quality evaluation indicator system for acute pancreatitis based on the theory of Donabedian’s structure-process-outcome quality model, in order to provide a reference for the clinical evaluation of the quality of care for acute pancreatitis. Methods: Through literature review, expert consultation, and analytic hierarchy process, 22 experts were effectively surveyed and their consensus opinions were obtained to determine the content and weight of the quality evaluation index system for acute pancreatitis nursing. Results: After two rounds of expert consultation, the questionnaire recovery rates were 95.65% and 100% respectively, the authoritative coefficients of experts were 0.86 and 0.88 respectively, and Kendall coordination coefficients were 0.406, 0.391, and 0.325. The final indicator system consisted of 3 first-level indicators, 11 second-level indicators, and 28 third-level indicators. Conclusion: The nursing quality evaluation indicator system for acute pancreatitis was scientific and reliable, which can provide scientific references for evaluating nursing quality for acute pancreatitis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.236