检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]联勤保障部队大连康复疗养中心健康管理部医学影像科,辽宁 大连 [2]联勤保障部队大连康复疗养中心健康管理部信息科,辽宁 大连
出 处:《临床医学进展》2024年第8期826-828,共3页Advances in Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的:评价薄层CT对肺气肿合并肺大疱的诊断价值。方法:对60例肺气肿合并肺大疱病例进行1.0 mm薄层CT重建,并与5.0 mm常规厚层CT扫描比较。图像分析共分2组,2人2次完成阅片。结果:60例患者中,轴位常规CT和薄层CT仅对同1例患者没有诊断出肺大疱,常规CT中有19例没有发现全部小于1 cm的肺气肿,另有11例只显示部分小于1 cm的肺气肿。结论:目前采用重建1.0 mm层厚的薄层CT图像在评价肺大疱的数量能力等同于厚层CT,薄层CT则显示了其余全部的小于1 cm的肺气肿、肺大疱。薄层CT在评价肺气肿的数量、肺气肿和肺大疱细节的能力优于厚层CT。Objective: To evaluate the value of thin-slice CT in the diagnosis of emphysema complicated with bulla. Methods: 60 cases of emphysema complicated with bulla were reconstructed by 1.0 mm thin-slice CT and compared with 5.0 mm thick slice CT. The image analysis was divided into 2 groups. 2 people read the images twice. Results: Among the 60 patients, only 1 patient was not diagnosed with bullosa by conventional axial CT and thin-slice CT. 19 patients were not found with emphysema smaller than 1 cm in total, and 11 patients were only found with emphysema smaller than 1 cm. Conclusion: At present, thin-slice CT images with 1.0 mm thickness reconstruction are equivalent to thick slice CT in the quantitative evaluation of pulmonary bulla, and thin-slice CT shows all other emphysema and pulmonary bulla less than 1 cm. Thin-slice CT was superior to thick slice CT in evaluating the number of emphysema and the details of emphysema and bulla.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222