浅析“两种生产”理论的关系——基于《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》的研究  

On the Relationship between “Two Kinds of Production” Theory—Research Based on the Origin of Family, Private Ownership and State

作　　者：胡锦焱 汤泉[1] 朱庭仪 

机构地区：[1]上海出版印刷高等专科学校,上海

出　　处：《哲学进展》2022年第1期32-35,共4页Advances in Philosophy

摘　　要：恩格斯在《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》中提出的“两种生产”理论在国内外一直引起争论,反对者认为“两种生产”理论不仅割裂了唯物史观的统一性,而且质疑了生产决定发展的规律。不管怎样,笔者认为原著中的文字都需要仔细拜读研究,揣摩恩格斯在书中的真正的内涵,维护“两种生产”理论的真理性。因此我们有必要再次回到原著中去理解恩格斯对于“两种生产”理论的实在涵义。The theory of “two kinds of production” put forward by Engels in the origin of family, private ownership and state has been controversial at home and abroad. Opponents believe that the theory of “two kinds of production” not only separates the unity of historical materialism, but also questions the law that production determines development. In any case, the author believes that the words in the original work need to be carefully read and studied, figure out the real connotation of Engels in the book, and maintain the truth of the theory of “two kinds of production”. Therefore, it is necessary for us to return to the original work to understand the real meaning of Engels’ theory of “two kinds of production”.

关 键 词：“两种生产”理论 生产理论二元对立 辩证统一 

分 类 号：A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]