检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:严庆
机构地区:[1]贵州大学,贵州 贵阳
出 处:《哲学进展》2022年第6期2120-2124,共5页Advances in Philosophy
摘 要:法治不因身份地位不同而区别对待,不因同样的行为产生同样的法律后果,保障国家、社会和个人在公平轨道上发展;功利是以利益为出发点,追求利益最大化,凡事都以利益为重,凡事都要考虑清楚。二者看似矛盾,实际上存在紧密的内部联系,法治为社会功利提供保障,社会功利思想紧密结合与法治观念之中。本文以功利主义与法治之间的内部联系进行分析,探索我国社会主义法治的功利性。The rule of law does not discriminate because of different status, does not produce the same legal consequences because of the same behavior, to ensure that the country, society and individuals in the fair track of development;utilitarianism is the starting point for benefits, the pursuit of profit maximization, everything to the interests of the first thing, everything should be considered clearly. The two seem to be contradictory, but in fact there is a close internal relationship. The rule of law provides security for social utility, and the thought of social utility is closely combined with the idea of rule of law. Based on the internal connection between utilitarianism and the rule of law, this article explores the utility of our socialist rule of law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158