检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟齐婧
机构地区:[1]武汉大学马克思主义学院,湖北 武汉
出 处:《哲学进展》2024年第2期296-301,共6页Advances in Philosophy
摘 要:在西方哲学史上,辩证法思想和本体论一样历史悠久。然而长期以来,辩证法逐渐被人们理解为一种外在的形式的方法,即将辩证法理解为可以应用于任何内容之上的形式范畴,其奠基于其上的本体论基础却被彻底地忽视了。由于将“绝对精神”设定为本体论基础,黑格尔最终窒息了辩证法;费尔巴哈对黑格尔哲学的本体论进行了“颠倒”,但却丧失了辩证法的原则,最终折返回了形而上学;马克思则通过在本体论层面的根本变革,保留了黑格尔辩证法的合理内核,即以“实践”为本体论基础,实现了辩证法和本体论的真正统一。In the history of Western philosophy, dialectic thought has a long history as well as ontology. How-ever, for a long time, dialectics has been gradually understood as an external formal method, that is, dialectics is understood as a formal category that can be applied to any content, but the ontological basis on which it is based has been completely ignored. By setting “absolute spirit” as the ontologi-cal basis, Hegel finally suffocated dialectics;Feuerbach reversed the ontology of Hegel’s philosophy, but he lost the principle of dialectics and returned to metaphysics. Marx retained the rational core of Hegel’s dialectics through the fundamental reform of ontology, that is, taking “practice” as the basis of ontology, and realized the true unity of dialectics and ontology.
分 类 号:A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.227