以“感性确定性”观梁漱溟文化哲学方法论中的“现量”  

Viewing “Pratyaksa” in Liang Shuming’s Cultural Philosophy by Sensuous-Certainty

作　　者：路拓宇 

机构地区：[1]中央民族大学哲学与宗教学学院,北京

出　　处：《哲学进展》2024年第7期1621-1625,共5页Advances in Philosophy

摘　　要：梁漱溟的文化哲学以唯识宗的“三量说”为基础,其中“现量”是唯识宗最为推崇的部分,梁漱溟在《唯识述义》中对其进行了讲解和批判。本文以黑格尔的《精神现象学》为基础以批判唯识宗的“现量”和梁漱溟对唯识宗的批判。本文同意梁漱溟对于“现量”的观点,但不同意其批判唯识宗的理由,认为其并未意识到“存在”的直接性和非谓词特性。Liang Shuming’s cultural philosophy is based on the “Three Quantities Theory” of the Vijnanavada, among which “pratyaksa” is the most respected part of the Vijnanavada, and Liang Shuming explained and criticized it in “The Meaning of Vijnaptimatra”. Based on Hegel’s The Phenomenology of Spirit, this paper criticizes the “pratyaksa” of Vijnanavada and Liang Shuming’s criticism of it. This paper agrees with Liang Shuming’s view of “pratyaksa”, but disagrees with his reasons for criticizing the Vijnanavada, and thinks that he does not realize the directness and non-predicative characteristics of “be”.

关 键 词：梁漱溟 现量 精神现象学 黑格尔 

分 类 号：B94[哲学宗教—宗教学]