卢卡奇物化理论与马克思异化理论的联系与区别探析  

An Exploration of the Connections and Differences between Lukács’ Theory of Objectification and Marx’s Theory of Alienation

作　　者：杨爱珍 

机构地区：[1]广西大学马克思主义学院,广西 南宁

出　　处：《哲学进展》2024年第10期2788-2795,共8页Advances in Philosophy

摘　　要：卢卡奇在《历史和阶级意识》一书中提到的物化理论将资本主义生产过程作为其批判对象彻底揭开了物化的神秘面纱,马克思在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中提出的异化理论重新界定了异化的概念,揭示了人的生存困境。卢卡奇的物化理论是对马克思异化理论的继承和扩展,卢卡奇借用马克思在《资本论》中提出的商品拜物教思想理论来阐述其物化概念,并且将物化概念从政治、经济方面展开对资本主义社会的批判,进一步看到了主体思想领域的物化现象同时对这一现象进行批判。卢卡奇的物化理论与马克思的异化理论在批判对象等方面具有一定的相似性,但是可以从理论出发点、概念内涵等方面可以发现二者区别。深入挖掘卢卡奇物化理论和马克思异化理论的联系和区别,可以为中国特色社会主义建设提供借鉴,对新时代坚持和发展中国特色社会主义有着重要的理论意义和现实意义。Lukács’ theory of objectification mentioned in his book History and Class Consciousness takes the capitalist production process as the object of his criticism and completely unveils the mystery of objectification, and Marx’s theory of alienation proposed in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 redefines the concept of alienation and reveals the predicament of human existence. Lukács’s theory of objectification is the inheritance and expansion of Marx’s theory of alienation, Lukács borrows the theory of commodity fetishism thought proposed by Marx in Capital to elaborate his concept of objectification, and develops the concept of objectification from the political and economic aspects of the critique of the capitalist society, and further sees the phenomenon of objectification in the field of the subject’s thought while critiquing this phenomenon. Lukács’s theory of objectification and Marx’s theory of alienation have certain similarities in terms of the object of criti

关 键 词：物化理论 异化理论 卢卡奇 马克思 

分 类 号：A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]