检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]深圳大学心理学院,广东 深圳 [2]广东医科大学附属东莞第一医院儿童生长发育中心,广东 东莞 [3]广东医科大学附属东莞第一医院精神心理科,广东 东莞
出 处:《心理学进展》2025年第2期14-21,共8页Advances in Psychology
基 金:2022年东莞市社会发展科技面上项目(编号:20221800902692);广东医科大学附属东莞第一医院关于“攀峰100”联合培优计划项目(编号:PF100-1-06)。
摘 要:目的:探讨团体心理干预对改善CPP女童生活质量的作用。方法:选取91例生活质量不佳CPP女童,随机分为对照组44例和治疗组47例,两组均给予GnRHa治疗和随访。对照组接受常规宣教。治疗组在接受对照组治疗方案的基础上,同时接受为期2月的团体心理干预。干预前、后分别对两组的患儿使用《儿少主观生活质量问卷量表》(ISLQ)、《中文版家庭功能评估量表》(FFAS-C)进行评估。比较两组的ISLQ评分、FFAS-C评分和生长发育情况,了解团体心理干预的影响。结果:与常规治疗相比,治疗组的ISLQ评分更高(P P P > 0.05)。结论:团体心理干预有助于改善CPP女童的家庭功能和生活质量。Objective: To explore the effect of group psychological intervention on improving the quality of life of CPP girls. Methods: Ninety-one CPP girls with poor quality of life were randomly divided into control group (44 cases) and treatment group (47 cases). Both groups were given GnRHa treatment and follow-up. The control group received routine education. In addition to the control group, the treatment group received group psychological intervention for 2 months. Before and after the intervention, the children in the two groups were evaluated by the Subjective Quality of Life Questionnaire (ISLQ) and the Chinese Version of Family Function Assessment Scale (FFAS-C). ISLQ score, FFAS-C score and growth and development of the two groups were compared to find out the effect of group psychological intervention. Results: Compared with the control group, the treatment group had higher ISLQ scores (P 0.05) and lower FFAS-C scores (P 0.05). There was no significant difference between these two groups in growth indicators (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Group psychological intervention can improve the family function and quality of life of CPP girls.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.233