检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉体育学院心理学系,湖北 武汉 [2]河南大学心理学系,河南 开封
出 处:《心理学进展》2025年第2期378-388,共11页Advances in Psychology
摘 要:本研究旨在探讨大五人格问卷在投喂流浪猫狗群体和不投喂流浪猫狗群体中的测量等值性,检验两群体在人格特质上的差异。使用简版的大五人格特质问卷(MINI International Personality Item Pool, Mini-IPIP),以线上线下的方式收集457份问卷,验证性因子分析和探索性结构方程模型结果显示Mini-IPIP的五个维度均拟合良好(CFI: 0.989~0.998, RMSEA: 0.011~0.030, SRMR: 0.013~0.042)。多组探索性结构方程模型显示,简版大五人格特质问卷在投喂组和不投喂组的组间形态等值、弱等值、强等值和严格等值模型均可被接受(ΔCFI p = 0.883, d = 0.163)没有显著差异。综上所述,Mini-IPIP在投喂者和不投喂者之间严格等值,且投喂者比不投喂者的宜人性、神经质得分都会更高。This study aims to explore the measurement equivalence of the Big Five Personality Questionnaire between groups that feed stray cats and dogs and those that do not, examining the differences in personality traits between the two groups. Using the short version of the Big Five Personality Traits Questionnaire (MINI International Personality Item Pool, Mini-IPIP), a total of 457 questionnaires were collected through online and offline methods. Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling results indicate that the five dimensions of the Mini-IPIP fit well (CFI: 0.989~0.998, RMSEA: 0.011~0.030, SRMR: 0.013~0.042). Multi-group exploratory structural equation modeling shows that the forms of measurement invariance, weak invariance, strong invariance, and strict invariance of the short version of the Big Five Personality Traits Questionnaire between the feeding group and the non-feeding group are all acceptable (ΔCFI p = 0.883, d = 0.163). In summary, the Mini-IPIP demonstrates strict equivalence between feeders and non-feeders, with feeders scoring higher in agreeableness and neuroticism than non-feeders.
关 键 词:投喂行为 人格特质 测量等值性 多组探索性结构方程模型 验证性因素分析
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28