马克思“重建个人所有制”与合作社理论的逻辑关系研究——兼论通向“自由人联合体”的“过渡点”形式  

A Study of the Logical Relationship between Marx’s “Reconstruction of Individual Ownership” and Cooperative Theory—On the “Transition Point” Form Leading to the “Free Association of Free People”

作　　者：彭燕 谢元态[1] 

机构地区：[1]江西农业大学经济管理学院,江西 南昌

出　　处：《社会科学前沿》2019年第10期1718-1725,共8页Advances in Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目《马克思主义合作理论:功能内涵、演进逻辑及创新发展》[16BJL001]的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：马克思“重建个人所有制”思想和合作社理论有着内在的逻辑联系。本文首先述评了关于“重建个人所有制”内涵的几种主要观点,阐述马克思“自由人联合体”与“重建个人所有制”的关系,然后论证合作社与股份制“过渡点”的性质和目标,分析马克思关于“个人所有制”的“重建”基础与条件;最后得出结论:作为重建个人所有制的过渡点形式,股份制是消极的过渡点,合作社是积极的过渡点,而股份合作社则是综合的过渡点。Marx’s “reconstruction of individual ownership” thought and cooperative theory have an inherent logical connection. This paper first reviews several main points about the connotation of “reconstruction of individual ownership”, expounds the relationship between Marx’s “free association of people” and “reconstruction of individual ownership”, and then demonstrates the nature and goals of the “transition point” of cooperatives and joint-stock systems, and analyzes basis and conditions for Marx’s “reconstruction” of “personal ownership”. It is finally concluded that as a transitional point of rebuilding individual ownership, the shareholding system is a negative transition point;cooperatives are a positive transition point, and stock cooperatives are a comprehensive transition point.

关 键 词：重建个人所有制 自由人联合体 合作社 过渡点 关系 

分 类 号：F32[经济管理—产业经济]