中国反垄断法安全港制度的立法路径  

The Legislative Path of the Safe Harbor System of China’s Antitrust Law

作　　者：刘瑞悦 王卫东[2] 

机构地区：[1]河北农业大学,人文社会科学学院,河北 保定 [2]河北农业大学,法学系,河北 保定

出　　处：《社会科学前沿》2022年第12期5394-5398,共5页Advances in Social Sciences

摘　　要：反垄断法安全港制度的构建已经吸引了全球的目光,各国纷纷根据实际情况对本国反垄断法中关于安全港制度的条款进行适时革新,中国也不例外。我国最新的《反垄断法(修正草案)》第十九条就对安全港制度作出了立法层面的回应,但由于受限于立法技术和立法水平,加之国内反垄断法立法领域内复杂的现实情况,对安全港制度的构建与完善仍存在较大阻力。中国在明晰反垄断安全港条款的立法演进及立法价值的基础上,选择性地借鉴美国的《关于竞争者之间合谋的反托拉斯指南》和欧盟委员会发布的《欧盟非重要协议通告》与《纵向协议集体豁免条例》中两种不同的模式,最终探寻出一条反垄断法安全港制度的中国立法思路。China is one of several nations that have timely updated its antitrust laws’ provisions on the safe harbor system in accordance with the real scenario in response to the development of the safe harbor system of antitrust law. The safe harbor system is addressed by Article 19 of China’s most recent draft amendment to the antimonopoly law, but due to the limitations of legislative technology and level as well as the complicated realities of domestic antimonopoly legislation, there is still significant opposition to its development. China draws only partially from the U.S. Antitrust Guidelines on Collusion among Competitors and the two different models in the EU Circular on Non-Material Agreements and the Regulation on Block Exemptions for Vertical Agreements issued by the European Commission in order to clarify the legislative evolution and legislative value of the antitrust safe harbor provisions. Finally, China explores a Chinese legislative idea of the safe harbor system of antitrust law.

关 键 词：反垄断立法 安全港制度 反垄断 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]