检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵梦迪
机构地区:[1]天津大学法学院,天津
出 处:《社会科学前沿》2023年第1期134-140,共7页Advances in Social Sciences
摘 要:知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度在司法适用中存在众多问题:适用对象泛化、适用条件弱化、侵权获利或者权利人受损巨大认定标准不一、公共利益内涵模糊。问题的解决需要严格把握惩罚性赔偿制度适用的构成要件,澄清主客观构成要件区分标准;明确惩罚性赔偿制度的功能与定位,将知识产权刑事案件立案追诉标准作为获利或受损巨大的标准之一;回归立法本意和立法原则,合理把握公共利益的内涵。There are many problems in the judicial application of the punitive damages system of intellectual property rights: The generalization of the applicable object, the weakening of the applicable conditions, the different recognition standards for the infringement profit or the great damage to the obligee, and the vague connotation of public interest. To solve the problems, it is necessary to strictly grasp the constituent elements of the application of punitive damages system and clarify the distinction standards between subjective and objective constituent elements;clarify the function and orientation of the punitive damages system, and take the standards for filing and prosecuting intellectual property criminal cases as one of the standards for huge profits or losses;return to the original intention and principle of legislation, and reasonably grasp the connotation of public interest.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185