上市公司法定代表人越权担保的认定与责任承担  

Determination and Liability of Ultra Vires Guarantee by Legal Representative of List Company

作　　者：王一帆 

机构地区：[1]天津大学法学院,天津

出　　处：《社会科学前沿》2023年第3期1058-1068,共11页Advances in Social Sciences

摘　　要：上市公司作为公众公司,其对外担保涉及众多中小股东的利益,但实践中上市公司法定代表人越权担保造成公众利益损害的现象频发。本文通过实证分析,研究近三年上市公司越权担保案件,从实践中对越权担保行为效力裁判路径的转变入手,明晰上市公司法定代表人越权担保行为效力的认定标准;从判断法定代表人的代理权外观入手,明确相对人的审查义务;从《最高人民法院关于适用有关担保制度的解释》出台前后法律责任承担的变化入手,分析豁免上市公司担保责任和赔偿责任的价值正当性。理解立法与实践之间的相互作用,推进上市公司对外担保行为的规范化。As public companies, the external guaranties provided by listed companies involve the interests of many small and medium-sized shareholders. However, in practice, the legal representatives of listed companies frequently provide guaranties beyond their authority, which results in damage to the public interests. This paper studies the cases of ultra vires guaranty of listed companies in recent three years by empirical analysis. Starting from the change of approaches in the adjudication of the validity of the act of guarantee provided by the legal representative of a listed company in practice, this article clarifies the standards for determining the validity of the act of guarantee provided by the legal representative of a listed company. Starting from judging the appearance of the power of agency of a legal representative, this article defines the review obligation of the counterpart. Starting from the changes in legal liabilities before and after the promulgation of the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on the Application of the Related Guarantee Systems of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China, the article analyzes the value legitimacy of the exemption of listed companies’ guarantee and indemnification liabilities. The interaction between legislation and practice shall constantly promote the standardization of foreign guaranty provided by listed companies.

关 键 词：上市公司对外担保 越权担保 审查义务 担保无效 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]