检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方政航
机构地区:[1]浙江农林大学文法学院,浙江 杭州
出 处:《社会科学前沿》2023年第6期3050-3054,共5页Advances in Social Sciences
摘 要:经济的不断发展也带来了更为严重的环境问题,出现了许多专业性强、危害严重的环境犯罪,过错责任原则渐渐无法完全适应当前严峻的环境污染现状。本文通过对英美法系国家在环境犯罪领域所适用的严格责任进行研究,发现相对严格责任将主观层面的证明责任交给了被告人,其实质是推定和举证责任的倒置,符合我国刑法的基本原则,可在环境犯罪领域为我国所适用。以期解决目前我国环境犯罪严重的问题,维护司法的公平正义,打击环境犯罪的行为。The continuous development of the economy has also brought more serious environmental problems, resulting in many highly professional and harmful environmental crimes. The principle of fault liability is gradually unable to fully adapt to the current severe environmental pollution situation. This article studies the strict liability applicable in the field of environmental crimes in common law countries. Relatively strict liability places the subjective burden of proof on the defendant, which is essentially an inversion of presumption and burden of proof. It conforms to the basic principles of China’s criminal law and can be applied in the field of environmental crimes in China. In order to solve the serious problem of environmental crimes in China, maintain judicial fairness and justice, and combat environmental crimes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49