行政审判管辖改革与司法公正的实现  

The Reform of Administrative Trial Jurisdiction and the Realization of Judicial Justice

作　　者：莫小可 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京

出　　处：《社会科学前沿》2023年第7期3918-3924,共7页Advances in Social Sciences

摘　　要：行政审判活动中行政权通过向法官或者法院施压干预司法审判活动,严重影响了司法公正。从地方兴起的行政审判管辖改革,试图将行政区划与法院管辖相分离来排除行政干预。管辖改革的模式多样,包括提级管辖、异地管辖、集中管辖和建立跨区划法院。然而,实践中出现了诉讼成本高、无法完全排除干预、改革模式混乱且进度不一、与审判重心下沉相矛盾、跨区划法院地位不明等等问题。管辖改革的未来发展离不开各地改革的统一以及发展方向的明确。同时行政审判中的司法公正是一个复合性问题,不能仅仅依靠管辖改革,还需要从法官和行政官员以及管理体制上进行改革。Administrative power in administrative trial activities interferes with judicial trial activities by exerting pressure on judges or courts, which seriously affects judicial justice. The jurisdictional reform of administrative trials, which has emerged from localities, attempts to exclude adminis-trative interference by separating administrative division from the jurisdiction of courts. There are various models of jurisdictional reform, including elevated jurisdiction, remote jurisdiction, centralized jurisdiction and cross-region courts. However, problems have arisen such as high litigation costs, inability to completely exclude intervention, confusion and inconsistent progress of reform models, contradiction with trial center moving down, and the unclear status of cross- region courts. The future development of jurisdiction reform is inseparable from the unity of re-gions and the clear direction of development. At the same time, the judicial justice in the administrative trial is a compound problem, which can not only rely on the reform of the jurisdiction, but also need to be reformed from the cooperation of judges and administrative officials and the management system.

关 键 词：行政审判管辖改革 司法公正 行政干预 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]