检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王冬玉
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京
出 处:《社会科学前沿》2023年第9期5483-5488,共6页Advances in Social Sciences
摘 要:本文通过对行政诉讼管辖制度实务改革和立法历程的详细梳理,探究我国行政诉讼中地方政府干预法院独立公正行使审判权这一问题从出现到解决的过程,得出如下反思:该问题由于司法权地方化、法院体制行政化以及人情社会的环境土壤因而具有中国特色;行政诉讼管辖的立法进程与实践改革之间互为引导,互相支撑;不论何种改革方案,都需既追求法理价值又兼顾操作层面的实际可行。异地管辖制度在确保法院顺利审理行政诉讼案件、维护行政相对人合法权益、推动依法行政方面具有重要意义。然而,各地的行政诉讼管辖改革进程不一,异地管辖面临取证难、诉讼成本高、上级法院干预基层法院等问题。因此,需要充分完善与异地管辖相配套的执行制度,以确保行政诉讼能够发挥其完整作用和意义。This paper conducts a detailed review of practical reforms and legislative developments in the administrative litigation jurisdiction system, aiming to explore the process by which the issue of local government intervention in the independent and impartial exercise of judicial powers by courts in administrative litigation has emerged and been resolved in China. The following reflec-tions are drawn: This issue possesses distinct Chinese characteristics due to the localization of judicial authority, administrative institutionalization of courts, and the societal environment characterized by personal relationships;the legislative progression of administrative litigation jurisdiction is intricately interwoven with practical reforms, mutually guiding and supporting one another;any reform initiative, regardless of its nature, necessitates a balance between doctrinal values and pragmatic feasibility. The cross-regional jurisdiction regime holds significant significance in ensuring the smooth adjudication of administrative litigation cases, safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of administrative counterparts, and promoting lawful administration. Nevertheless, the progress of administrative litigation jurisdiction reforms varies across regions, and cross-regional jurisdiction cases face challenges such as evidentiary difficulties, high litigation costs, and higher-level court interference with lower-level courts. Hence, it is imperative to comprehensively refine the implementation mechanisms aligned with cross-regional jurisdiction arrangements, ensuring the holistic effectiveness and significance of administrative litigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.188.157