检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]兰州大学法学院,甘肃 兰州
出 处:《社会科学前沿》2023年第10期5531-5538,共8页Advances in Social Sciences
摘 要:ESG投资以可持续发展、良好的公司治理及社会责任践行为价值导向,基本理念与投资收益模式不同于传统的投资方向。ESG理念纳入资产管理人考量的投资要素时,遭遇了与信义义务存在冲突的质疑。深入剖析可知,ESG投资并未偏离受益人利益最大化需求,符合资产管理人信义义务的内在逻辑,且能够实现与资产管理行业目标的一致性。有必要通过ESG披露与评级制度完善、资产管理人信义义务的体系化构建、资产管理人法律责任的明晰等举措促进资产管理人ESG投资的法治保障,实现资产管理行业良性发展与经济高质量发展的共赢。ESG investment is value oriented towards sustainable development, good corporate governance, and social responsibility practices. Its basic philosophy and investment return model are different from traditional investment directions. When incorporating ESG concepts into the investment elements considered by asset managers, there have been doubts about conflicts with fiduciary obligations. Through in-depth analysis, it can be seen that ESG investment has not deviated from the need to maximize the interests of beneficiaries, conforms to the inherent logic of the fiduciary obligations of asset managers, and can achieve consistency with the goals of the asset management industry. It is necessary to promote the legal protection of ESG investment by asset managers through measures such as improving the ESG disclosure and rating system, systematizing the fiduciary obligations of asset managers, and clarifying the legal responsibilities of asset managers, in order to achieve a win-win situation between the healthy development of the asset management industry and high-quality economic development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15