过度支配与控制情形下全资子公司人格否认制度——以北京三中院某电线公司诉某电装公司股东损害债权人利益责任纠纷案为例  

The Disregard of Personality of Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries under the Circumstance of Excessive Dominance and Control—Taking the Case of a Electric Wire Company Suing a Shareholder of an Electric Installation Company for Liability for Infringement of Creditor’s Interests as an Example

作　　者：韩烨 

机构地区：[1]天津大学法学院,天津

出　　处：《社会科学前沿》2024年第6期275-281,共7页Advances in Social Sciences

摘　　要：为了维护债权人的合法权益,企业法人人格否定制度在母子公司这种集团组织形态下遭遇了重大挑战。在实际操作中,母公司作为子公司的唯一股东,其过度的支配和控制现象尤为突出。这一现象揭示了我国法律在界定过度支配和控制的构成要素及其边界、明确母子公司连带责任范围方面存在的不足。针对这一问题,本文将参考北京三中院公布的“二十个公司类纠纷经典案例之十九—某电线公司诉某电装公司股东损害债权人利益责任纠纷案”,对过度支配与控制的认定标准进行深入分析。In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of creditors, the system of denying corporate personality has encountered significant challenges in the context of group organizations such as parent-subsidiary companies. In practice, the excessive domination and control exercised by the parent company as the sole shareholder of the subsidiary company is particularly prominent. This phenomenon reveals the shortcomings of our legal system in defining the constituent elements and boundaries of excessive domination and control, as well as clarifying the scope of joint and several liabilities between parent and subsidiary companies. In response to this issue, this paper will refer to the “19th of the 20 classic cases of company disputes released by the Beijing No. 3 Intermediate People’s Court”—the case of “Shenzhen Cable Company v. Shenzhen Electrical Equipment Company: Liability of Shareholders for Damaging Creditors’ Interests”—and conduct in-depth analysis on the criteria for determining excessive domination and control.

关 键 词：全资子公司 过度支配与控制 人格混同 人格否认制度 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]