刑事判决书事实认定说理问题研究  

Research on Fact-Finding in Criminal Judgment Reasoning

作　　者：蔡靖婷 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海

出　　处：《社会科学前沿》2024年第7期335-343,共9页Advances in Social Sciences

摘　　要：判决书作为“看得见的正义”的直接载体,其说理问题的研究日益得到重视并向类型化深入。由于学术研究存在对法律适用说理的偏向,有必要加强对比之更具复杂性和不确定性的事实认定问题的关注。通过实证研究,对刑事判决书事实认定说理存在的说理缺乏逻辑性、说理缺乏针对性和量刑事实说理缺失等问题展开技术和体制两个层面的原因分析,进而从说理内容和文书格式的内部完善与法官选任和文书公开等外部保障角度探寻对上述不足的改进路径。As the direct carrier of “visible justice”, the research on judgment reasoning has been increasingly emphasized and typologically deepened. Due to the bias of law application reasoning in academic research, it is necessary to pay more attention to the fact-finding problem with more complexity and uncertainty. Based on the empirical research of fact-finding in criminal judgment reasoning, this paper analyzes the reasons for the lack of logicality and pertinence of reasoning and the lack of sentencing fact reasoning from two aspects of technology and system. The improvement paths are proposed from the internal and external perspectives, the former consists of perfecting the content and format of reasoning in criminal judgment documents, and the latter includes selecting judicial officers and improving the system of publicizing case judgments online.

关 键 词：刑事判决书 事实认定 裁判说理 裁判文书 实证研究 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]