宜居宜业和美乡村建设与马克思自然观的内在联系探赜——基于社会主体研究法的视角  

Study on the Intrinsic Connection between the Building of a Beautiful and Harmonious Countryside That Is Desirable to Live and Work in and Marx’s View of Nature —Based on the Perspective of Social Subject Research Methodology

作　　者：彭梦宇 

机构地区：[1]西南大学国家治理学院,重庆

出　　处：《社会科学前沿》2024年第11期47-53,共7页Advances in Social Sciences

摘　　要：在传统理论视域下,黑格尔和费尔巴哈分别从人化自然和自在自然出发,形成单向度的思辨自然观和朴素唯物自然观,却忽略了社会主体的实践作为人与自然关系的中介作用。马克思在强调人化自然的同时承认自在自然的优先性,实现了对以往自然观的变革。随着时代发展,实现自在自然与人化自然的有机统一已然成为乡村治理与振兴的重要理论基础,“宜居”“宜业”“和美”就是在本体论、历史观、方法论以及价值观上实现了马克思自然观在当代的创新性继承。在社会主体研究法下对其进行多维度分析,有助于进一步理解人与自然和谐共生的现代化发展道路。Under the traditional theoretical threshold, Hegel and Feuerbach formed a unidirectional discursive view of nature and a simple materialistic view of nature from the humanized nature and nature in itself. However, they both neglected the intermediary role of the practice between human beings and nature. Marx recognized the priority of nature in itself while emphasizing humanized nature, achieving a change in the previous view of nature. As times evolve, the realization of the organic unity of nature in itself and humanized nature has become an important theoretical basis for rural governance and revitalization. A Beautiful and Harmonious Countryside represents an innovative inheritance of Marx’s view of nature in contemporary times, achieved in ontology, historical perspective, methodology, and values. Multi-dimensional analysis under the social subject research method helps to further understand the modernization development path of harmonious coexistence between human beings and nature.

关 键 词：和美乡村 自在自然 人化自然 乡村生态文明 

分 类 号：A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]