检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南省气象灾害防御技术中心,湖南 长沙 [2]气象防灾减灾湖南省重点实验室,湖南 长沙 [3]湖南省气象局机关服务中心,湖南 长沙
出 处:《气候变化研究快报》2023年第6期1141-1146,共6页Climate Change Research Letters
摘 要:为了比较LMI和ADTD闪电资料之间的相关性和差异,文章基于湖南省2022年ADTD数据和LMI湖南地区2022年闪电数据,对卫星和地基两套探测系统的闪电数据进行对应分析。结果表明:两者数据的匹配比例在月变化曲线上呈现双峰值特征,两者监测到的高频率闪电活动月份基本一致,匹配比例较为稳定的是春季,夏季的匹配度普遍高于春季;两者数据在日变化特征上保持了较好的一致性,呈现出单峰值分布的规律;湖南省云地闪比率值随纬度的变化不明显,平均值为1.96,星地探测数据得出的云地闪比率值与ADTD实测数据计算出的云地闪比率值基本吻合。To compare the correlation and differences between LMI and ADTD lightning data, based on the ADTD data of Hunan Province in 2022 and the lightning data of Hunan Province, the article correspondently analyzes lightning data from satellite and ground-based detection systems. The results indicate that: the matching ratio of the two data shows a bimodal feature on the monthly variation curve, the months of high-frequency lightning activity monitored by both are basically the same, the most stable matching ratio is in spring, the matching degree in summer is generally higher than that in spring;the two data maintain good consistency in daily variation characteristics, showing a pattern of single peak distribution;the variation of cloud to ground flash ratio values with latitude in Hunan Province is not significant, the average value is 1.96, the cloud to ground lightning ratio value obtained from satellite to ground exploration data is basically consistent with the cloud to ground lightning ratio value calculated from ADTD measured data.
关 键 词:卫星LMI闪电探测系统 ADTD闪电定位系统 星地闪电探测数据 云地闪比率特征
分 类 号:P41[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49