检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱小雅
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2021年第4期263-269,共6页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:游戏外挂这一灰色产业链在近些年逐步发展,案件数量逐渐增多。由于对外挂实现作弊目的的技术手段认识不清、开发者与销售者在案件中所实施的具体行为认定存在偏差,这类案件的罪名认定一直存在较大差异。游戏外挂类案件应首先界定规制外挂的具体范围,了解游戏外挂程序为实现作弊所使用的具体技术手段,再分类讨论开发者与销售者在案件中所实施行为的罪名认定。制作、销售外挂行为应认定为侵犯著作权罪,而使用外挂的行为则不构成犯罪。The gray industry chain of gameplug-ins has gradually developed in recent years, and the number of cases alsoincreased. Due to the unclear understanding of the technical means to achievethe purpose of cheating by plug-ins, and the deviations in the identificationof specific behaviors carried out by developers and sellers in cases, therehave been large differences in the identification of charges in these cases.Game plug-in cases should first define the specific scope of the regulationplug-in, understand the specific technical means, then classify and discuss thecriminalization of the behavior of the developer and the seller in the case.The act of making and selling plug-ins should be regarded as a crime ofcopyright infringement, while the act of using plug-ins does not constitute acrime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42