选择之债的具体适用——以本土语境与比较法立法例的比对为中心  

The Specific Application of the Debt of Choice—Centering on the Comparison between the Local Context and the Legislation of Comparative Law

作　　者：吴昊 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海

出　　处：《争议解决》2021年第4期270-278,共9页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：选择之债乃债法理论之中,债的形态的一种,且在《中华人民共和国民法典》颁布之前付之阙如。《民法典》实施之后,学者亦鲜有提及选择之债之具体适用。在定义上,选择之债指于数宗给付中,依选择而定一宗之给付为标的之债;而对于这一债之形态的核心,即在于选择权的界定——含义、归属、性质以及为各立法例如出一辙所确定的跳转规则。在外部,选择之债需要与单一之债、种类之债、选择竞合等概念加以区分。在功能性上,选择之债亦得与债法上其他制度,特别是给付不能、合同僵局下的解除发生牵连。The selected debt is one of the formsof debt in the theory of debt law, and it was not paid before the promulgationof the “Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China”. After the implementationof the Civil Code, scholars rarely mentioned the specific application ofselected debt. In terms of definition, the debt of choice refers to the debt ofchoice among several payments, and one payment is the subject of the choice;the core of the form of this debt lies in the definition of the right ofchoice—meaning, attribution, nature, and for each legislative example, thereare exactly the same jump rules determined. Externally, the debt of choiceneeds to be distinguished from the concepts of single debt, type of debt, andselective competition. In terms of functionality, the chosen debt may also beimplicated in other systems in the debt law, especially the inability to payand the termination of contract deadlock.

关 键 词：选择之债 选择权 替代权 给付不能 合同僵局 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]