检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡兆洋
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2022年第2期251-258,共8页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:军事法院审理民事案件是否合法、是否应当、如何规范是学界热议的话题之一,随着依法治军战略的推进及中国军队“走出去”的进程,军事法院审理民事案件有着迫切的现实需求。通过文献研究、比较分析等方法梳理学界对此问题的理论争议,可以得知当前军事法院审理民事案件存在合法性缺陷,但具有理论和现实的合理性,故应当加快出台军事法院组织法,对军事法院审理民事案件作进一步的明确规定,完善军事法院审理民事案件的配套措施。The legality, desirability andregulation of the trial of civil cases by military courts are one of the hottopics in the academic circle. With the promotion of the strategy of runningthe army according to law and the process of “going out” of The Chinese army,the trial of civil cases by military courts has an urgent practical need.Through literature research, comparative analysis and other methods to sort outthe theoretical controversies on this issue, we can learn that the current thetrial of civil cases by military courts has a legality deficiency, but hastheoretical and practical rationality, so we should speed up the promulgationof the organic law of the military court, make further clear provisions for the military court hearing civil cases,and improve the supporting measures for the military court hearing civilcases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.216.39