ODR运行中的“数据主权”维护  

Maintenance of “Data Sovereignty” in ODR Operation

作　　者：李奕廷 

机构地区：[1]青岛大学法学院,山东 青岛

出　　处：《争议解决》2022年第4期1030-1036,共7页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：ODR作为一种在线纠纷解决形式,其概念有狭义和广义之分。就我国的ODR实践现状来看,采取广义的ODR概念更加符合现实情况。其中,非司法ODR的自治性意味着ODR体系中的一部分有脱离国家“数据主权”控制的风险,而司法ODR的存在则提供了一种双方对接的可能性。司法机关作为行使国家权力的主体之一,理应成为ODR回归我国“数据主权”框架下的媒介,在ODR的自治性与国家控制之间搭建共存的桥梁。As an online dispute resolution form, the concept of ODR can be divided into narrow sense and broad sense. In the narrow sense, ODR refers to extrajudicial ADR;broadly speaking, ODR is divided into out of court ODR (non judicial ODR) and court ODR (judicial ODR). As far as the current situation of ODR practice in China is concerned, adopting the broad con-cept of ODR is more in line with the reality. Among them, the autonomy of non judicial ODR means that some parts of the ODR system are at risk of being out of the control of national “data sover-eignty”, while the existence of judicial ODR provides a possibility for both sides to connect. As one of the subjects exercising state power, the judiciary should be the media under the framework of ODR’s return to China’s “data sovereignty” and build a bridge between the autonomy of ODR and state control.

关 键 词：司法ODR 非司法ODR 数据主权 ODR体系 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]