检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:裴永楠
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2023年第1期137-148,共12页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:在GATS语境下划定具体承诺表中各项条目的内容边界,需要解释工具、解释方法作为辅助,而现有的分类体系就是解释工具。本文从中国电子支付案切入,围绕该案所涉相关问题,结合WTO其他的经典案例,就中国涉案服务的分类、GATS项下的服务分类内部逻辑、现有服务贸易的分类框架以及存在的问题等做具体分析,并针对该案的专家组报告提出疑问望在未来的谈判、纠纷甚至修改承诺表时,吸取WTO的“判例”精神以及他国的经验,在未来为国家争取最大的权益。To delimit the boundary of each entry in the schedule of specific commitments in the context of GATS, interpreta-tion tools and interpretation methods are needed, and the existing classification system is the interpretation tool. This article starts from WTO China-Certain Measures Affecting Electronic Payment Services Case and discusses about related topics such as the internal logic of the classification of the service under GATS, the framework of classification of the existing service trade framework and existing problems, in combination with other classic cases of WTO. Also, the paper proposes questions coming from the panel reports, in the hope that the WTO “jurisprudence” spirit and good experience of other countries could be absorbed by our country, so that the largest interests can be gotten in future negotiations, disputes solving and even modifying schedule of commitments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.85.3