论合理使用中的“适当引用”情形——兼评《西部畅想》著作权侵权纠纷案  

On the Cirof “Proper Quotation” under Fair Use—Concurrent Review the Copyright Infringement Case of Western Imagination

作　　者：张旭婷 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海

出　　处：《争议解决》2023年第1期226-232,共7页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：全文复制作品受到著作权法复制权的限制,这点毋庸置疑。对于作品内容的部分复制也应当认定为著作权法意义上的复制。《西部畅想》著作权侵权纠纷案中,被控侵权作品并不符合合理使用的要件,应当承担侵权责任。另外,转换性使用不应直接适用于我国司法实践,应当以现行法律为依据,司法解释至多可以起到扩大解释的作用。There is no doubt that the reproduction of a whole work is subject to the reproduction right under copyright law. Partial reproduction of a work should also be considered as reproduction in the sense of copyright law. In the Copyright Infringement Case of Western Imagination, the allegedly infringing work doesn’t meet the elements of fair use and should be held liable for infringement. In addition, transformative use should not be directly ap-plied to judicial practice in China, but should be based on the existing law, and judicial interpretation can at most play the role of expanding interpretation.

关 键 词：复制权 署名权 合理使用 转换性使用 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]