检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林慧勤
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,知识产权学院,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2023年第2期635-642,共8页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:在市场经济高速运行的背景下,许多商业主体为了追求效率最大化,常会借助商标使用许可的方式从事经营活动。到目前为止,现有的商标研究主要是从商标权的取得、限制、侵权和救济机制等方面入手。前述问题早有结论,但商标使用许可问题尚未被深入探讨。本文立足我国商标使用许可的立法规定和司法实践现状,试图从中找出该制度的问题,并参考国外的立法,发表我国商标使用许可制度该如何改革的拙见。Under the background of high-speed market economy, many commercial entities usually engage in business activities through trademark licensing in order to maximize efficiency. So far, the existing trademark studies have mainly focused on the acquisition, restriction, infringement and relief mechanism of trademark rights. The problems mentioned above already have conclusions, but the issue of trademark licensing has not been discussed deeply. Based on current situation of legislation and judicial practice, this paper tries to find out problems of the system. By comparing foreign legislation, I will put forward some humble opinions on how to reform Chinese trademark licensing system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.91.46