我国司法实践中枉法仲裁罪主体问题探析  

An Analysis of the Subject of the Crime of Arbitrating by Violating the Law in Judicial Practice in China

作　　者：卢玉 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学国际法学院,上海

出　　处：《争议解决》2023年第3期701-708,共8页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：枉法仲裁罪的犯罪主体为依法承担仲裁职责的人员,但对于依法承担仲裁职责的人员范围以及仲裁员的性质,理论界一直存在较大争议,未能达成一致意见,鉴于目前我国已将《仲裁法》修改列入立法项目,完善仲裁员监督和规范制度是我国《仲裁法》修改应关注的重点。根据我国法院司法实践,枉法仲裁罪的主体不仅适用于民商事仲裁员,也适用于劳动争议仲裁员。仲裁委员会主任、秘书可以成为枉法仲裁罪的主体,但应满足仲裁委员会主任、秘书长的枉法行为对仲裁裁决有实质性影响,枉法调解行为的仲裁员属于枉法仲裁罪的规制范围,因此我国《仲裁法》修改过程中可以借鉴司法实践,可以更好指导新的《仲裁法》文本。The criminal subject of the crime of perverting the law for arbitration is the personnel who bear arbitration responsibilities in accordance with the law. However, there has been significant controversy in the theoretical community regarding the scope of personnel who bear arbitration responsibilities in accordance with the law and the nature of arbitrators, and no consensus has been reached. Considering that China has included the revision of the Arbitration Law as a legislative item, improving the supervision and standardization system of arbitrators is the focus of attention in the revision of the Arbitration Law. According to the judicial practice of Chinese courts, the subject of the crime of perverting the law for arbitration is not only applicable to civil and commercial arbitrators, but also to labor dispute arbitrators. The chairman and secretary of the arbitration commission can become the subjects of the crime of perverting ar-bitration, but they should meet the substantive impact of the chairman and secretary general’s perverting behavior on the arbitration award. Arbitrators who engage in perverting mediation be-havior belong to the scope of regulation of the crime of perverting arbitration. Therefore, in the process of revising China’s Arbitration Law, judicial practice can be used for reference, which can better guide the new text of the Arbitration Law.

关 键 词：仲裁法 枉法仲裁罪 主体范围 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]