法律后果错误的体系重建  

System Reconstruction of Error in Legal Consequences

作　　者：李兆鑫 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海

出　　处：《争议解决》2023年第3期730-736,共7页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：自法律后果错误概念提出以来,学者对其定性及处理颇有质疑,但尚未经由体系化理论支撑而流传至今的处理路径却存在缺陷,不仅导致相关法律规范不甚明晰,而且成为司法实践的具文。对此种重要的错误类型,亟需理论基础的滋润,方能使其在学说与判例中焕发出固有的光泽。本文以法律后果错误的理论体系和处理路径为研究对象,结合意思表示解释的相关内容,运用比较分析法、法解释学等方法。在对中德法的实体解释规则、强制性法律规范、补充性法律规范以及合同的补充性解释进行进一步阐述的基础上,力求重新构建法律后果错误体系。Since the concept of error in legal consequences was put forward, scholars have questioned its nature and treatment, but the treatment path that has not yet been supported by systematic theory and has been circulated to now has defects, which not only leads to the unclear legal rules, but also becomes a concrete docu-ment of judicial practice. For this important type of error, it needs the nourishment of the theoreti-cal basis to make it glow with inherent luster in the theories and precedents. This paper takes the theoretical system and treatment path of error in legal consequences as the research object, com-bines the relevant content of interpretation of meaning expression, and uses comparative analysis, legal hermeneutics and other methods. On the basis of further elaboration of the substantive inter-pretation rules, mandatory rules, supplementary rules and supplementary interpretation of contracts in China and German law, we strive to reconstruct the system of error in legal consequences.

关 键 词：法律后果错误 意思表示解释 实体解释规则 补充性规范 强制性规范 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]