检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]信银理财有限责任公司,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2023年第3期873-880,共8页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:随着私募股权基金的大量到期和风险暴露,基金清算纠纷已日渐引起市场和机构的高度关注。基金清算过程中因各种原因导致清算工作无法有效和及时开展,采取强制清算司法救济手段是当前化解私募基金清算中前述窘境的有效途径之一。本文以有限合伙型私募股权基金为切入点,拟通过阐述该类基金的现状,对相关司法案例、相关立法以及实务操作等内容进行梳理和分析,以便相关主体能够用好或有效应对强制清算手段,从而使得相关工作“有备无患”。With a large number of private equity (PE) funds maturing and exposed to risks, fund liquidation disputes have increas-ingly attracted a high degree of attention from the market and institutions. As the liquidation of funds cannot be carried out effectively and timely due to various reasons, judicial remedies for compulsory liquidation are one of the effective ways to resolve the aforementioned dilemma in the liquidation of private equity funds. Taking limited partnership (LP) private equity funds as the starting point, this article intends to explain the current situation of these funds, sort out and ana-lyze the relevant judicial cases, relevant legislation and practical operations, so that the relevant entities can use or effectively deal with the compulsory liquidation means, having relevant work be well prepared.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198