检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海政法学院法律学院,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2023年第3期989-994,共6页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:行政法学一直以内容繁杂著称,这也是其体系化构建面临的最大困难,然而,虽然行政法学内容众多,包罗万象,但是对于行政法体系化的构建一直以来都是行政法学界努力的方向。当前主流对于行政法体系的发展不外乎两种方向,一是整合,整合的最终目标即像《中华人民共和国民法典》的制定与出台一样,制定一部行政法典;二是分化,分化是目前我国行政法体系的一大特点,那么我们是否要在原有基础上继续分化,发挥各个领域的极致。本文将基于我国行政法的特点,结合国情,探讨行政法体系的整合与分化。Administrative law has always been known for its complex content, which is also the biggest difficulty in its systematic construction. However, the content of administrative law is numerous and all-encompassing, the systematic construction of administra-tive law has always been the direction of efforts of the administrative law circle. The current main-stream has two directions for the development of the administrative law system. One is integration. The final goal of integration is to formulate an administrative code like the formulation and prom-ulgation of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China;the second is differentiation, which is a major feature of China’s administrative law system at present. So whether we should continue to differentiate on the original basis and give full play to the best in various fields, this article will dis-cuss the integration and differentiation of the administrative law system based on the characteris-tics of China’s administrative law and the national conditions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.161.96