检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《争议解决》2023年第3期1035-1041,共7页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:权利克减作为紧急状态制度的核心,是公民的基本权利在整个社会利益前做出的重大让步,是国家治理能力和治理体系现代化的重要组成部分。但是当前我国在公民权利克减方面仍存在众多问题,譬如适用情形不明、权利克减程序及救济制度不完善等。而制定《紧急状态法》业已成为回应对紧急权力的功能期待,依法应对权利克减的法律风险的有效途径。As the core of the emergency system, derogation of rights is a major concession of citizens’ basic rights in front of the interests of the whole society, and is an important part of the modernization of national governance capacity and system. However, there are still many problems in the derogation of citizens’ rights in China, such as unclear circumstances of application, imperfect procedures of derogation and relief system. The enactment of the Emergency Law has become an effective way to respond to the expectation of emergency powers and the legal risk of derogation in accordance with the law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90