醉驾出罪的司法困境及其破解  

The Judicial Dilemma of Drunk Driving and Its Solution

作　　者：沈崟萱 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海

出　　处：《争议解决》2023年第3期1115-1122,共8页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：十余年来,醉驾入刑在理论和实务界都存在着较大的分歧,主要集中在“醉驾一律入罪”的必要性上。“干预前置”和“严而不厉”的刑法治理模式造成了“醉驾”刑事案件的迅速增长,为此急需合理控制相关犯罪圈的扩张。有关醉驾出罪问题的探讨,司法层面试图适用刑法第十三条“但书”条款以减缓抽象危险犯所引发的“泛刑事化”,但效果并不明显。更为合理的尝试是在立法层面强化“情节”在入罪判断中的核心作用,实现轻微醉驾行为的出罪化。For more than ten years, there have been great differences in theory and practice between the criminalization of drunk driving, mainly focusing on the necessity of “criminalizing drunk driving”. The criminal law gov-ernance model of “pre-intervention” and “strict but not harsh” has led to the rapid growth of “drunk driving” criminal cases, so it is urgent to reasonably control the expansion of related criminal cir-cles. Regarding the discussion of the crime of drunk driving, the judicial level has tried to apply the “proviso” clause of Article 13 of the Criminal Law to alleviate the “pan-criminalization” caused by abstract dangerous offenders, but the effect is not obvious. A more reasonable attempt is to strengthen the central role of “circumstances” in the determination of criminalization at the legisla-tive level, and realize the criminalization of minor drunk driving.

关 键 词：危险驾驶罪 醉驾入刑 “但书”出罪 情节犯 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]