基于国际法视阈对欧盟《反经济胁迫条例》的考量  

Consideration of the EU Anti-Economic Coercion Regulation Based on the International Law Perspective

作　　者：龚书琪 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学国际法学院,上海

出　　处：《争议解决》2023年第4期1327-1332,共6页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：国家或国家集团通过经济、金融、贸易等形式的对外制裁以达到其政治和经济目的,已经成为目前国际社会的常见现象。在此背景下欧盟委员会出台《反经济胁迫条例》草案,以此加入这场制裁与反制裁的无限循环斗争中。该草案所言胁迫已经完全超出了传统国际法上的胁迫,并且认为反胁迫就是国际法中的反措施,甚至可以对不属于国际法主体的私人或者企业使用。认定胁迫需要符合国际法,使用反胁迫措施也并非没有限制。The use of external sanctions by countries or groups of countries in the form of economic, finical and trade sanctions to achieve their political and economic goals has become a common phenomenon in the international community nowadays. In this context, the European Commission has introduced the draft Anti-Coercion Regulation, thereby joining the infinite cycle of sanctions and countersanctions. The draft regulation refers to coercion that goes beyond the traditional international law of coercion and considers anti-coercion as a countermeasure in international law, which can be used even against private individuals or companies that are not subjects of international law. A finding of coercion requires compliance with international law, and the use of anti-coercive measures is not without limits.

关 键 词：胁迫 反胁迫 反措施 国家责任 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学]