犯罪成本扣除问题案例研究  

Case Research on Criminal Cost Deduction Problem

作　　者：孙华建 

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学法学院,贵州 贵阳

出　　处：《争议解决》2023年第4期1542-1546,共5页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：诈骗犯罪中,对于犯罪成本是否扣除,法律及司法解释没有明确的规定,司法实践中亦存在不同观点。诈骗罪中,嫌疑人支付给被害人的财物,在认定诈骗金额时是否扣减,这直接影响诈骗罪的成立与否,也关系到被害人被骗财物的退赔或追缴额。在司法实践中,犯罪成本是否扣除应当立足于案件行为人角度出发,兼顾被害人利益,将对被害人具有经济价值的犯罪成本应当予以扣除,更能符合刑法原则。In the crime of fraud, there is no clear stipulation in law and judicial interpretation on whether the crime cost is deducted, and there are different opinions in judicial practice. In the crime of fraud, the suspect pays to the victim’s property, in the identification of the amount of fraud is deducted, which directly affects the establishment of the crime of fraud or not, but also relates to the victim cheated property refund or recovery amount. In judicial practice, whether the deduction of crime cost should be based on the perspective of the perpetrator of the case, taking into account the interests of the victim, the criminal cost of economic value to the victim should be deducted, which is more in line with the principle of criminal law.

关 键 词：诈骗犯罪 犯罪成本 经济价值 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]