论行政机关在环境行政公益诉讼中的不完全履职  

On the Incomplete Performance of Administrative Organs in Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation

作　　者：应珊 

机构地区：[1]宁波大学法学院,浙江 宁波

出　　处：《争议解决》2023年第4期1636-1649,共14页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：本文立足于司法实践,从实践案例中分析出环境行政公益诉讼行政机关的履职存在履职期限模糊、履职方式粗糙,以及履职标准不明等问题。基于对司法裁判案例的分析,针对环境行政公益诉讼中行政机关的履职问题,在履职理念更新与履职方式转化前提下,寻求完善行政机关完全履职的对策,首先确立总体期限与推进阶段治理来确保环境的公共利益得到修复,其次提倡以修复为主赔偿为辅的履职方式并要求行政机关不以单次履行作为结束,以确保行政机关以“参与者”的角色进行环境修复,最后为契合环境行政公益诉讼“维护公共利益的”目的确立以结果标准为原则,行为标准为例外的履职标准。Based on judicial practice, this paper analyzes the problems in the performance of duties of administrative organs of environmental administrative public interest litigation from practical cases, such as vague performance period, rough performance methods and unclear performance standards. Based on the analysis of judicial adjudication cases, aiming at the performance of duties by administrative organs in environmental administrative public interest litigation, this paper seeks to improve the countermeasures for the complete performance of duties by administrative organs under the premise of updating the concept of performance and transforming the mode of performance. First, it establishes the overall term and promotes the stage of governance to ensure that the public interests of the environment are repaired. Secondly, it advocates the performance of duties supplemented by compensation and requires administrative organs not to end with a single performance. In order to ensure that the administrative organ takes the role of “participant” in environmental restoration, and finally establish the performance standard with the result standard as the principle and the behavior standard as the exception for the purpose of “safeguarding public interests” in environmental administrative public interest litigation.

关 键 词：环境公共利益 履职方式 履职期限 履职标准 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]