检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任思和
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2023年第4期1724-1732,共9页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:在刑事诉讼中,刑事鉴定请求权行使是实施鉴定的关键一步。根据《刑事诉讼法》第一百四十八条规定,当事人缺少首次鉴定权利,刑事司法鉴定启动权配置存在不足,基本被公检法垄断并且缺少有效的机制对该权力的行使进行监督,当事人救济权等正当权利被剥夺,稳定的控辩审三角结构被打破。根据国情和域外立法,建议赋予当事人初次刑事鉴定申请权,限制侦查机关鉴定启动权,加强检察机关监督职能,消极化法院启动权并建立强制鉴定机制。In the criminal procedure, the exercise of the right of request is a key step in the implementation of the forensic appraisal. According to the provisions of Article 148 of the Criminal Procedure Law, the parties lack the right to make the first appraisal, the allocation of the starting right of criminal judicial appraisal is insufficient, the public prosecution law basically monopolizes, and there is no effective mechanism to supervise the exercise of the power, the parties are deprived of legitimate rights such as the right to remedy, and the stable triangular structure of prosecution, defense and trial is broken. According to the national conditions and foreign legislation, it is suggested to grant the parties the right to apply for the initial criminal appraisal, restrict the investigative organs’ right to initiate the appraisal, strengthen the supervision function of procuratorial organs, negate the court’s right to initiate the appraisal and establish a compulsory appraisal mechanism.
关 键 词:刑事司法鉴定 刑事司法鉴定启动权的配置方式 刑事司法鉴定申请权
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.242.128