虚假刷单套现行为的刑法定性分析  

The Qualitative Analysis of the Criminal Law of False Brushing and Cashing Out Behavior

作　　者：李晨雨 

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学刑事法学院,陕西 西安

出　　处：《争议解决》2023年第4期1761-1767,共7页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：随着“智能支付程序”的广泛应用,一些侵财犯罪从以往的现实空间转移到网络空间,关于虚假刷单套现行为的定性问题,在司法实践中存在盗窃罪、诈骗罪认定困难的情况。以机器本身不能受骗来否定虚假刷单套现行为的诈骗性质,从而作为定盗窃罪的依据是值得商榷的。当行为人利用智能支付程序“识别功能”的认识错误,通过虚假刷单让网络平台“自觉自愿”垫付钱款时,即符合了诈骗罪的行为特征,应以诈骗罪论处。With the widespread application of “intelligent payment programs”, some crimes of property infringement have shifted from the past real space to the online space. Regarding the qualitative issues of false brushing and cashing out behavior, there are difficulties in identifying theft and fraud in judicial practice. It is worth discussing that denying the fraudulent nature of false brushing and cashing out behavior based on the fact that the machine itself cannot be deceived is the basis for determining the crime of theft. When the perpetrator misunderstood the “recognition function” of the intelligent payment program and used false swiping to make the payment platform “voluntarily” advance payment, it meets the behavioral characteristics of the crime of fraud and should be punished as a crime of fraud.

关 键 词：智能支付程序 虚假刷单 盗窃罪 诈骗罪 处分意识 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]