检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高海柔
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2023年第5期1999-2006,共8页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:纯粹经济损失是否属于侵权责任法的保护范围,即纯粹经济损失是否具备可赔偿性是研究侵权责任法绕不开的热点问题。纯粹经济损失相较于普通的损害具有特殊性,其赔偿规则亟待明晰。由于我国立法中未明确规定纯粹经济损失是否能够作为一项应受保护的法益,各类案件不同程度地体现了法官对于自由裁量权的运用,这导致纯粹经济损失案件判决结果的不确定性。因此,对于纯粹经济损失的赔偿规则之探索并且进行可赔偿类型化的研究有益于帮助实务界维持判决结果的确定性。Whether pure economic loss belongs to the scope of protection of tort liability law, that is, whether pure economic loss is compensable is a hot issue that cannot be avoided in tort liability law. Compared with ordinary damage, pure economic loss has its particularity, its compensation rules need to be clarified urgently, and the theoretical views on whether pure economic loss should be compensated are also quite rich. The legal circle has studied the cases involving pure economic loss for many years, but there is no clear stipulation in our legislation on whether pure economic loss can be regarded as a legal interest that should be protected. All kinds of cases reflect the use of the judge’s discretion to different degrees, which leads to the uncertainty of the judgment result of pure economic loss cases. Therefore, the exploration of the compensation rules of pure economic loss and the study of compensable types have both theoretical and practical value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.186.244