经营性虚拟盘案件的刑法定性  

The Criminal Law Qualification of Operating Virtual Market Case

作　　者：周博文 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海

出　　处：《争议解决》2023年第5期2142-2149,共8页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：虚拟盘案件的刑法定性存在诈骗罪与非法经营罪的争议,主要是经营性虚拟盘案件中对平台信息虚假陈述行为、虚构形象引流并引导投资行为的行为应如何定性的问题。对徐某非法经营案中法官的观点进行检视,可以得出两条教义学规则:参考域外刑法对“事实”的研究,不确定的事实不能成为欺骗行为的内容;引入客观归责中“风险”的概念,欺骗行为应造成交易“风险”的提高。经营性虚拟盘案件中相关行为不符合欺骗行为的标准,若该当“变相期货交易”的要件,应认定非法经营罪。There is content about the controversy over the criminal law qualification of crime of fraud and crime of illegal business in virtual market cases. The main issue is how to qualify the behavior of false statements of platform information, and fictitious expert image to attract customers and guide investment in operating virtual market case. The examination of the judge’s opinion in Xu’s illegal business case leads to two penal dogmatic rules: uncertain facts cannot become the content of deception behavior;deception behavior should increase the “risk” of transactions. The relevant behaviors in operating virtual market case do not meet the standards of deception behavior. If they meet the requirements of “disguised futures trading”, they should be recognized as illegal business crimes.

关 键 词：虚拟盘 诈骗罪 非法经营罪 欺骗行为 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]