检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘思佳[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江师范大学法学院,浙江 金华
出 处:《争议解决》2023年第5期2273-2279,共7页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:担保圈融资可以缓解信息不对称下银行风险,降低交易成本,但也会放大企业危机,易形成企业大规模违约现象,产生金融风险。企业是担保圈形成的主要因素,也是担保圈危机爆发的根本原因,银行抽贷只是一个直接导火索,故应从企业本身出发遏制担保圈的形成。我国当下主要依靠银行监管、政府兜底两种事中、事后解决措施,缺少源头预防机制实则治标不治本。应从我国《公司法》出发,完善相关制度环境,从权利制度、程序制度、主体资格上对企业担保圈融资进行限制,预防担保圈的形成。Guarantee circle financing can alleviate bank risks and reduce transaction costs under information asymmetry, but it will also amplify enterprise crises, easily form a large-scale enterprise default phenomenon, and produce financial risks. Enterprises are the main factor in the formation of the guarantee circle, but also the fundamental reason for the outbreak of the guarantee circle crisis. Bank lending is just a direct trigger, therefore, the formation of the guarantee circle should be curbed from the enterprise itself. At present, China mainly relies on bank supervision and government to solve the problem during and after the event and lack of a source prevention mechanism. Starting from the Company Law, we should improve the relevant institutional environment, restrict the financing of enterprise guarantee circles from the rights system, procedural system and subject qualifications, and prevent the formation of guarantee circles.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7