检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李浩榕
机构地区:[1]南昌大学法学院,江西 南昌
出 处:《争议解决》2023年第5期2331-2338,共8页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:随着移动互联网的广泛普及和应用,自媒体现已成为民众获取信息、进行交流互动的重要平台,同时也为权利救济开启了一扇新的大门。通过自媒体平台进行私力救济已逐渐演变为一种普遍现象,且涉及到财产权、名誉权等多个领域。然而,此种私力救济在带来便利的同时也产生了一些潜在的法律风险,譬如说滥用网络暴力、侵犯个人隐私等,权利主体极易走向维权不当和维权过度的极端,进而对我国法治及社会秩序均产生负面影响。通过分析自媒体视域下私力救济的特点、实现模式、成因及潜在风险,并提出相应的规制措施,以促进自媒体与法律的和谐共生,为我国社会矛盾纠纷的解决和法治建设提供有益参考。With the widespread popularization and application of the mobile Internet, self-media has become an important platform for the public to obtain information, communicate and interact, and has opened a new door for rights remedies. Private remedies through self-media platforms have gradually evolved into a common phenomenon, involving property rights, reputation rights and other fields. However, such private remedies bring convenience but also produce some potential legal risks, such as the abuse of network violence, infringement of personal privacy, etc. The rights of the subject are very easy to go to the extremes of improper defense of rights and excessive defense of rights, which in turn has a negative impact on the rule of law and social order in China. By analyzing the characteristics, realization mode, causes and potential risks of private remedies in the field of self-media, and put forward corresponding regulatory measures, in order to promote the harmonious coexistence of self-media and law, and to provide useful references for the settlement of social conflicts and disputes and the construction of the rule of law in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171