浅谈我国侦查实验制度的立法现状及完善建议  

The Current Situation of the Legislation of China’s Investigative Experiment System and Suggestions for Improvement

作　　者：卢子君 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海

出　　处：《争议解决》2023年第6期2698-2706,共9页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：侦查实验是一项非常重要的侦查活动,但是,由于法律规定得相对简单,侦查实验还存在一些程序性规范问题。比如实施主体、参与对象和适用条件不够明确;程序性规定过于简略;缺乏规范性条件和监督机制等。侦查实验笔录作为一项法定的证据,由于法律规定的不足和证明机制的缺失,导致对其进行审查判断存在困难。针对以上问题提出相应解决对策,完善相关法律法规、拓展侦查实验的启动主体、明确实验适用条件、制定配套程序,对于发挥侦查实验制度准确认定案件事实、惩罚犯罪、保障人权的作用有着重要意义。The investigative experiment is a very important investigative activity, but, due to the relatively simple legal provisions, the investigative experiment still has some procedural regulation problems. For example, the implementation of the subject, the object of participation and applicable conditions are not clear enough;procedural provisions are too brief;lack of normative conditions and supervision mechanisms. As legal evidence, the lack of legal provisions and the absence of proof mechanism lead to difficulties in reviewing and judging the investigative experiment transcripts. In response to the above problems, corresponding countermeasures have been proposed to improve the relevant laws and regulations, expand the subject of initiating investigative experiments, clarify the conditions for their application, and formulate supporting procedures, which are of great significance in giving full play to the role of the experimental investigation system in accurately determining the facts of a case, punishing crimes, and safeguarding human rights.

关 键 词：侦查实验 侦查实验笔录 完善构想 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]