检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩昊呈
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2023年第6期2738-2747,共10页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:近年来我国离婚率持续攀升,为避免轻率离婚、竭力维护家庭和睦,消除离婚对社会的负面效应,我国《民法典》第1077条增设了离婚冷静期制度。本文就冷静期制度的合法性基础进行分析,分析视角包括社会视角、制度对象视角、伦理视角和法理视角四个方面。离婚率的持续攀升和非双系抚育对子女成长、人类繁衍的威胁是设置冷静期的社会基础;冲动型离婚是离婚冷静期的制度对象基础;既要个体幸福,也要婚姻长久是冷静期的伦理基础;自由原则和弱者保护原则是冷静期的法理基础。In recent years, China’s divorce rate continues to rise. In order to avoid frivolous divorce, make every effort to maintain family harmony, and eliminate the negative effects of divorce on society, China’s Civil Code, Article 1077 added a cooling-off period for divorce system. This paper analyzes the legitimacy of the cooling-off period system from four perspectives: social perspective, system object perspective, ethical perspective and legal perspective. The rising divorce rate and the threat of non-binary parenting to children’s growth and human reproduction are the social basis of the cooling-off period;impulsive divorce is the basis of the system object of the cooling-off period;the need for individual happiness as well as the longevity of the marriage is the ethical basis of the cooling-off period;the principle of liberty and the principle of protection of the weak are the jurisprudential basis of the cooling-off period.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.110.185