检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李琳娜
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2023年第6期2776-2784,共9页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:申诉制度源于宪法申诉权。作为申诉制度的宪法基础,宪法申诉权具有申诉对象的广泛性、申诉性质的双重性以及保障方式的相对性等特征。在我国法律体系中,申诉制度经历了由抽象权利到具体制度的归位过程,体现在从“申诉”到“申请再审”的演变以及由“申诉”到“行政复议”的回归中。同时,申诉在我国法律体系中作为具体制度路径的部分予以保留,但仍存在制度构建不完善、救济效果不显著等问题。为此,应完善特定群体的申诉救济路径、增强信访制度的法治化程度。The appeal system derives from the constitutional right of appeal. As the constitutional basis of the appeals system, the constitutional right of appeal is characterised by the broadness of its object, the dual nature of its appeal, and the relativity of its safeguards. In China’s legal system, the appeal system has gone through a process of relegation from an abstract right to a concrete system, which is reflected in the evolution from “appeal” to “application for retrial” and the return of “appeal” to “administrative review”. At the same time, the appeal is retained as part of the specific system path in China’s legal system, but there are still issues such as imperfect institutional construction and insignificant relief effects. For this reason, the path of redress for specific groups of people should be improved, and the level of legalisation in the petition system should be strengthened.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.227.49.178