第三人撤销之诉与案外人异议制度关系探讨  

Discussion on the Relation between the Third Party’s Revocation Proceeding and Reminder Serving as a Legal Remedy

作　　者：胡晨欢 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海

出　　处：《争议解决》2023年第6期2928-2934,共7页Dispute Settlement

摘　　要：我国十分注重对案外第三人权益的保护,为此设立了多种救济形式。多样化方式在发挥全方位保护案外第三人权益作用的同时,也带来了一些问题,最显著的就是制度之间的协调适用问题,比如,当案外第三人同时适用第三人撤销之诉与案外人异议时,这两种制度会出现竞合的问题。提出了以执行阶段为分界点,可以将第三人撤销之诉与案外人异议的竞合关系分为三个阶段讨论。分析了制度的竞合会造成资源浪费、讼累增加等恶劣影响,因而应当寻找出路避免竞合问题的出现。建议取消累赘的案外人异议,这便从根本上避免了两者发生竞合的可能性;同时要优化第三人撤销之诉中的担保制度,降低案外第三人中止执行的成本;还可以扩大案外人异议之诉的适用范围,确立其在执行阶段的优先适用地位。China attaches great importance to the protection of the rights of the third party, so it has set up a variety of ways of relief. While playing the role of comprehensive protection of the rights of the third party, diversified relief approaches also bring about some problems, and one of the most significant problems is the coordination and application of systems. For example, when the third party not only applies the third party’s revocation proceeding, but also applies reminder serving as a legal remedy, there is a concurrence between the two systems. Taking the execution stage as the cut-off point, discussion in different stages regarding the concurrence can be conducted. It is analyzed that because of the bad result of the waste of resources and the increase of the burden of litigation, the problem should be avoided. Reminder serving as a legal remedy should be set aside. At the same time, the guarantee system should be optimized to reduce the cost of suspending the execution. Expanding the scope of the outer party dissidence is also a good approach.

关 键 词：第三人撤销之诉 案外人异议 竞合关系 权益保护 救济途径 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]