检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张晶晶
机构地区:[1]上海大学法学院,上海
出 处:《争议解决》2023年第6期3055-3061,共7页Dispute Settlement
摘 要:保辜制度作为我国古代一项重要的刑事司法制度对现代司法仍有重要借鉴意义。基于现行人身伤害司法鉴定期限与审理期限的冲突、法律法规之间规定的鉴定期限不一致等问题,保辜制度中的“二次鉴定”制度可以有效解决上述冲突,完善人身伤害司法鉴定制度的体系性,促进恢复性司法建设。基于“二次鉴定”制度现代性转化过程中可能存在的潜在风险,通过明确其在审判实践中的具体适用,以促进“二次鉴定”制度更好地为现代司法实践服务。As an important criminal justice system in ancient China, the insure guilt system still has important reference significance for modern justice. Based on the conflicts between the current judicial appraisal period for personal injury and the trial period, as well as the inconsistency between the appraisal periods stipulated by laws and regulations, the “secondary appraisal” system can effectively solve the above-mentioned con-flicts, improve the systematic nature of the judicial appraisal system for personal injury, and promote the construction of restorative justice. Based on the potential risks that may exist in the modernization transformation process of the “secondary appraisal” system, by clarifying its specific application in trial practice, we aim to promote the “secondary appraisal” system to better serve modern judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.61.71